Post by wheelspinner on Feb 27, 2012 3:10:08 GMT -5
It's a source of constant wonderment to me why exactly Australians are so pissed off with their government. It is almost universally considered that Australia came through the GFC better than almost any other advanced economy. Unemployment is around 5% and improving, the economy is growing, government debt is around 6% of GDP, and interest rates are around 6.5% - well below the levels under the previous government. And yet the polls say Australians consider opposition leader Tony Abbott - a man who has never held an economic portfolio - to be far more trustworthy in managing the economy. This for a man whose current policies have a 70 billion unfunded component, and who refused to have his policies costed by Treasury at the last election. Instead they had their calculations checked by some tiny accounting firm, who were later found guilty of professional ethics breaches over their report.
What the hell gives?
Australians are also demanding a say in who should be PM, pissed off that they never got to vote for Gillard, and that she deposed Rudd, who they did vote for. Never mind that Gillard actually won the 2010 election on a two-party-preferred basis, and was the only leader capable of assembling a majority in Parliament - the sole test for who gets to be PM. This is pure ignorance at work. Our constitution defines what our vote entitles us to decide. No matter how campaigns are run and what the parties say, the cold, hard fact is that we do not choose our PM. Our vote lets us choose a Parliamentary representative, who is the one who gets a vote if they are in the majority party. It makes about as much sense as claiming that, because you own shares in BHP, you should get to pick the CEO. It doesn't work that way, and it never has. So why are Australians pissed off about this?
Similarly, a host of Australians are demanding a fresh election because they don't like the fact that Labor is running the country. They clam that Gillard "lied" about a carbon tax - like no politician ever lied in an election campaign before. The Liberal Opposition went into the 2007 campaign supporting a carbon price, but refused to support it in Parliament, even after Labor negotiated all the details with their leadership beforehand. Instead, they stabbed their leader in the back over it and Tony Abbott won the leadership by 1 vote as a result. And he now accuses Labor of lying and disunity.
The fact is, the Constitution is quite clear about when we have elections, and we aren't due to have one until late 2013. The timing of it is at the PM's discretion. This is how the country works; you don't get to demand another election just because you can't accept the result of the last one. Again, this is massive ignorance on display.
Of course our media are hugely culpable in all this, through their consistent failure to point these matters out and educate people. For them it is far easier to obsess endlessly about Gillard's poor polling and do everything possible to undermine her government.
As a result, we have the unedifying spectacle of our Foreign Minister resigning his post while still in Washington (!) so that he can challenge his leader and see if he can get his old job back. The ballot was held today, with the predictable result - the PM won by a landslide. That's what happens when you spend two years white-anting your colleagues - they tend not to have a high opinion of you. The public badly wants Rudd, but that is totally irrelevant (see above).
Of course the media will not stop there. They will continue to blather on about Rudd mobilising support for a challenge from the back bench, how the polls show he is a better chance than Gillard to win the next elction, Gillard's poor showing in the polls etc. They will not say one word about the more than 200 pieces of legislation that Gillard has successfully steered through a hung Parliament in a couple of years, other than to examine how unpopular it is making her. Apart from the general economic settings, she has introduced a carbon price, a resource rent tax, a disability insurance scheme, huge investments in schools and network infrastructure etc. This is not a do-nothing government, as hung Parliaments can often result in, but there is absolutely zero credit given for what they have done so far.
As someone commented today, I wonder would we be even talking about this if it was Julian Gillard and Kay Rudd. Hmmm.
Report below.
--------------------
Gillard prevails in leadership battle
Jessica Wright and Judith Ireland
February 27, 2012 - 3:57PM
Advertisement
The Pulse: Katharine Murphy blogs live from Canberra
Phillip Coorey: PM must stop kicking own goals
Michelle Grattan: Now the hard work begins
Peter Hartcher: Will of the people fails to sway caucus
Tony Wright: I'm Kevin and I'm here to help Julia
Julia Gillard has convincingly beaten Kevin Rudd in their leadership battle, 71 votes to 31, to retain the prime ministership.
In her press conference after her resounding victory, the Prime Minister said: ''Australians have had a gutful of seeing us focus on ourselves.
''Today I want to say to Australians one and all, this issue, the leadership question is now determined,'' she said.
''I can assure you that this political drama is over.''
Ms Gillard repeated her mantra of the 2010 coup that the Labor Party needed now to ''move forward'' and had instructed the party that Mr Rudd must be honoured as a past prime minister ''for his many achievements'', including the apology to the stolen generations, the successful steerage of the Australian economy through the global financial crisis and his ''amazing advocacy'' as foreign minister.
In his press conference after the ballot, Mr Rudd thanked the one-third of his colleagues who backed him and said he bore no grudges against those who spoke out against him.
Ms Gillard acknowledged that it was a difficult and disappointing day for Mr Rudd and his family.
''A very tough day indeed,'' she said.
She said that she had learnt important lessons and acknowledged that she had made mistakes, saying that she intended to be ''a stronger and more forceful advocate'' for the government's intentions.
In particular she said the public should have been given a full and proper explanation about the 2010 leadership coup that ousted Mr Rudd as leader.
''I accept I should have explained that at the time,'' she said.
''I have now had the opportunity to do so.''
Ms Gillard said that she was not prepared to canvass those events further as there had been vast public commentary on the matter over the past week.
''It should be at an end, our focus is on 2012 and all the years that lie beyond,'' Ms Gillard said.
She said she was confident that she could win the next election, adding that Labor and the Coalition had ''competing visions for the future''.
Ms Gillard said her overriding emotion for the day was impatience and that she wanted to ''get on'' with delivering policy and programs.
Addressing the media before Ms Gillard spoke to reporters, Mr Rudd also thanked those who did not vote for him for the friendship and messages of support in the past week and then addressed directly the factions and ''more willing critics''.
''I bear no grudges, I bear no one any malice and if have done the wrong thing, in what I have said or what I have done, then I apologise,'' he said.
It was ''past time the wounds are healed'', he said, referring to the deep division in the party that emerged during the leadership tussle. ''We have a higher purpose, to serve our nation, not ourselves,'' he said.
''I accept fully the verdict of the caucus,'' he said.
He said that he now ''devoted myself full to [Ms Gillard's] re-election''.
Mr Rudd said that he had stood for the leadership because he ''believed it was the right thing to do''.
He then delivered a lengthy statement in which he outlined the achievements he was most proud of as prime minister and more recently as foreign affairs minister.
Mr Rudd then moved on to his staff, singling them out by name. ''This is where you start to gum up. What can I say about you all? You are just terrific.''
Mr Rudd also thanked his wife, Therese Rein, and his children.
''Family for me is everything,'' he said. ''I could do nothing in public life if it was not for their support.''
To Ms Rein he said, ''Darling, you have been my rock.''
He confirmed he would continue in politics, saying ''I will continue to be the federal member of Griffith until well after the election.''
Mr Rudd referred to the drawn-out leadership battle, saying ''over the years we've had a few internal problems'' but that Labor was interested in ''building things'' while the opposition wanted to ''tear them down''.
''I will now throw my every effort into securing Julia Gillard's re-election as Prime Minister,'' he said.
Mr Rudd ended the press conference without taking questions, saying simply: ''We will now take our leave.''
Ms Gillard said for the time being Trade Minister Craig Emerson would act as Foreign Affairs Minister and she would announce her reshuffle in coming days.
She would not say whether the five ministers who had publicly supported Mr Rudd would be removed for disloyalty.
Returning officer and the member for Fowler, Chris Hayes, said directly after the ballot that the mood in the party room meeting had been ''reasonably tense''.
He also said that there was relief on the faces of some senators and MPs after the result and some clapping.
Neither Ms Gillard nor Mr Rudd spoke for more than three minutes in the Labor caucus meeting.
The meeting took more than an hour because of the need to vote and then count the votes, Mr Hayes said.
Labor MP Dick Adams also reported that Mr Rudd said that he would be ''right behind'' Ms Gillard from now on.
Ms Gillard emerged from the caucus room flanked by Treasurer Wayne Swan and Mr Emerson.
Yet despite Ms Gillard's resounding victory, Opposition Leader Tony Abbott said that her leadership was not safe and continued his call for an election.
Mr Abbott has formally requested that the independents state whether or not they have confidence in Ms Gillard as Prime Minister.
He said that today was not a ''new start'' for Ms Gillard but a ''stay of execution''.
He said that a bad government had been exposed by a ''whistleblower''.
''My message to the Australian people is very clear,'' Mr Abbott said shortly before question time.
''We are a great country that is being let down by a bad government.''
Mr Abbott repeated his call for an election.
''I think that the Prime Minister of this country should be chosen by the people and not by the faceless men,'' Mr Abbott said.
The Opposition Leader, who is often criticised as ''Dr No'' by the government, added that he was ''model of positivity'' compared with what Labor MPs had been saying about each other in recent days.
Follow the National Times on Twitter: @nationaltimesau
www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/gillard-prevails-in-leadership-battle-20120227-1txbz.html
What the hell gives?
Australians are also demanding a say in who should be PM, pissed off that they never got to vote for Gillard, and that she deposed Rudd, who they did vote for. Never mind that Gillard actually won the 2010 election on a two-party-preferred basis, and was the only leader capable of assembling a majority in Parliament - the sole test for who gets to be PM. This is pure ignorance at work. Our constitution defines what our vote entitles us to decide. No matter how campaigns are run and what the parties say, the cold, hard fact is that we do not choose our PM. Our vote lets us choose a Parliamentary representative, who is the one who gets a vote if they are in the majority party. It makes about as much sense as claiming that, because you own shares in BHP, you should get to pick the CEO. It doesn't work that way, and it never has. So why are Australians pissed off about this?
Similarly, a host of Australians are demanding a fresh election because they don't like the fact that Labor is running the country. They clam that Gillard "lied" about a carbon tax - like no politician ever lied in an election campaign before. The Liberal Opposition went into the 2007 campaign supporting a carbon price, but refused to support it in Parliament, even after Labor negotiated all the details with their leadership beforehand. Instead, they stabbed their leader in the back over it and Tony Abbott won the leadership by 1 vote as a result. And he now accuses Labor of lying and disunity.
The fact is, the Constitution is quite clear about when we have elections, and we aren't due to have one until late 2013. The timing of it is at the PM's discretion. This is how the country works; you don't get to demand another election just because you can't accept the result of the last one. Again, this is massive ignorance on display.
Of course our media are hugely culpable in all this, through their consistent failure to point these matters out and educate people. For them it is far easier to obsess endlessly about Gillard's poor polling and do everything possible to undermine her government.
As a result, we have the unedifying spectacle of our Foreign Minister resigning his post while still in Washington (!) so that he can challenge his leader and see if he can get his old job back. The ballot was held today, with the predictable result - the PM won by a landslide. That's what happens when you spend two years white-anting your colleagues - they tend not to have a high opinion of you. The public badly wants Rudd, but that is totally irrelevant (see above).
Of course the media will not stop there. They will continue to blather on about Rudd mobilising support for a challenge from the back bench, how the polls show he is a better chance than Gillard to win the next elction, Gillard's poor showing in the polls etc. They will not say one word about the more than 200 pieces of legislation that Gillard has successfully steered through a hung Parliament in a couple of years, other than to examine how unpopular it is making her. Apart from the general economic settings, she has introduced a carbon price, a resource rent tax, a disability insurance scheme, huge investments in schools and network infrastructure etc. This is not a do-nothing government, as hung Parliaments can often result in, but there is absolutely zero credit given for what they have done so far.
As someone commented today, I wonder would we be even talking about this if it was Julian Gillard and Kay Rudd. Hmmm.
Report below.
--------------------
Gillard prevails in leadership battle
Jessica Wright and Judith Ireland
February 27, 2012 - 3:57PM
Advertisement
The Pulse: Katharine Murphy blogs live from Canberra
Phillip Coorey: PM must stop kicking own goals
Michelle Grattan: Now the hard work begins
Peter Hartcher: Will of the people fails to sway caucus
Tony Wright: I'm Kevin and I'm here to help Julia
Julia Gillard has convincingly beaten Kevin Rudd in their leadership battle, 71 votes to 31, to retain the prime ministership.
In her press conference after her resounding victory, the Prime Minister said: ''Australians have had a gutful of seeing us focus on ourselves.
''Today I want to say to Australians one and all, this issue, the leadership question is now determined,'' she said.
''I can assure you that this political drama is over.''
Ms Gillard repeated her mantra of the 2010 coup that the Labor Party needed now to ''move forward'' and had instructed the party that Mr Rudd must be honoured as a past prime minister ''for his many achievements'', including the apology to the stolen generations, the successful steerage of the Australian economy through the global financial crisis and his ''amazing advocacy'' as foreign minister.
In his press conference after the ballot, Mr Rudd thanked the one-third of his colleagues who backed him and said he bore no grudges against those who spoke out against him.
Ms Gillard acknowledged that it was a difficult and disappointing day for Mr Rudd and his family.
''A very tough day indeed,'' she said.
She said that she had learnt important lessons and acknowledged that she had made mistakes, saying that she intended to be ''a stronger and more forceful advocate'' for the government's intentions.
In particular she said the public should have been given a full and proper explanation about the 2010 leadership coup that ousted Mr Rudd as leader.
''I accept I should have explained that at the time,'' she said.
''I have now had the opportunity to do so.''
Ms Gillard said that she was not prepared to canvass those events further as there had been vast public commentary on the matter over the past week.
''It should be at an end, our focus is on 2012 and all the years that lie beyond,'' Ms Gillard said.
She said she was confident that she could win the next election, adding that Labor and the Coalition had ''competing visions for the future''.
Ms Gillard said her overriding emotion for the day was impatience and that she wanted to ''get on'' with delivering policy and programs.
Addressing the media before Ms Gillard spoke to reporters, Mr Rudd also thanked those who did not vote for him for the friendship and messages of support in the past week and then addressed directly the factions and ''more willing critics''.
''I bear no grudges, I bear no one any malice and if have done the wrong thing, in what I have said or what I have done, then I apologise,'' he said.
It was ''past time the wounds are healed'', he said, referring to the deep division in the party that emerged during the leadership tussle. ''We have a higher purpose, to serve our nation, not ourselves,'' he said.
''I accept fully the verdict of the caucus,'' he said.
He said that he now ''devoted myself full to [Ms Gillard's] re-election''.
Mr Rudd said that he had stood for the leadership because he ''believed it was the right thing to do''.
He then delivered a lengthy statement in which he outlined the achievements he was most proud of as prime minister and more recently as foreign affairs minister.
Mr Rudd then moved on to his staff, singling them out by name. ''This is where you start to gum up. What can I say about you all? You are just terrific.''
Mr Rudd also thanked his wife, Therese Rein, and his children.
''Family for me is everything,'' he said. ''I could do nothing in public life if it was not for their support.''
To Ms Rein he said, ''Darling, you have been my rock.''
He confirmed he would continue in politics, saying ''I will continue to be the federal member of Griffith until well after the election.''
Mr Rudd referred to the drawn-out leadership battle, saying ''over the years we've had a few internal problems'' but that Labor was interested in ''building things'' while the opposition wanted to ''tear them down''.
''I will now throw my every effort into securing Julia Gillard's re-election as Prime Minister,'' he said.
Mr Rudd ended the press conference without taking questions, saying simply: ''We will now take our leave.''
Ms Gillard said for the time being Trade Minister Craig Emerson would act as Foreign Affairs Minister and she would announce her reshuffle in coming days.
She would not say whether the five ministers who had publicly supported Mr Rudd would be removed for disloyalty.
Returning officer and the member for Fowler, Chris Hayes, said directly after the ballot that the mood in the party room meeting had been ''reasonably tense''.
He also said that there was relief on the faces of some senators and MPs after the result and some clapping.
Neither Ms Gillard nor Mr Rudd spoke for more than three minutes in the Labor caucus meeting.
The meeting took more than an hour because of the need to vote and then count the votes, Mr Hayes said.
Labor MP Dick Adams also reported that Mr Rudd said that he would be ''right behind'' Ms Gillard from now on.
Ms Gillard emerged from the caucus room flanked by Treasurer Wayne Swan and Mr Emerson.
Yet despite Ms Gillard's resounding victory, Opposition Leader Tony Abbott said that her leadership was not safe and continued his call for an election.
Mr Abbott has formally requested that the independents state whether or not they have confidence in Ms Gillard as Prime Minister.
He said that today was not a ''new start'' for Ms Gillard but a ''stay of execution''.
He said that a bad government had been exposed by a ''whistleblower''.
''My message to the Australian people is very clear,'' Mr Abbott said shortly before question time.
''We are a great country that is being let down by a bad government.''
Mr Abbott repeated his call for an election.
''I think that the Prime Minister of this country should be chosen by the people and not by the faceless men,'' Mr Abbott said.
The Opposition Leader, who is often criticised as ''Dr No'' by the government, added that he was ''model of positivity'' compared with what Labor MPs had been saying about each other in recent days.
Follow the National Times on Twitter: @nationaltimesau
www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/gillard-prevails-in-leadership-battle-20120227-1txbz.html